The situation talked about in PLJ 1997 SC 985 included a declaration that respondents, remaining co-sharers, ended up house owners on the land. The accommodate was initially dismissed, but on attraction, it had been decreed in favor from the respondents. Nonetheless, certain goods are not labeled as immovable property in https://co-ownership-and-partitio77020.tokka-blog.com/31371560/getting-my-nuisance-and-land-use-wakeel-in-karachi-near-me-to-work